--- title: "The State of Independent Real Estate Websites 2026" description: "Selling websites to independent brokerages, agent teams and property managers? We scanned 133 of their sites: only 13% say what they charge. Median score 75/100. The fixable problems to pitch, Q4 2026." edition: "Q4 2026" date_published: 2026-10-15 date_modified: 2026-10-15 author: Clikiti canonical_url: https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4 pdf: https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4/report.pdf data: https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4/data.json data_csv: https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4/data.csv license: "CC BY 4.0" license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ attribution: "Clikiti, The State of Independent Real Estate Websites 2026 (Q4 2026), https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4" audience: "Web agencies and freelancers selling to independent brokerages, agent teams and property managers" sample_size: 133 margin_of_error: "up to ±8.5 percentage points (95% confidence)" data_source: automated scans of real websites --- # The State of Independent Real Estate Websites 2026 (Q4 2026) **Answer:** Only 13% of the 133 independent real estate websites we scanned say what they charge. *Free to use and cite under CC BY 4.0. Credit Clikiti with a link.* For small agencies and freelancers who sell websites to independent brokerages, agent teams and property managers. We scanned 133 of their websites: 2% score under 60 out of 100, and 86% leave at least three of the questions buyers, sellers and landlords ask unanswered. Here is where the winnable work is, which problems to lead a pitch with, and how to show them without days of spec design. Clikiti scanned 133 independent real estate websites in October 2026 and checked each one against 12 checks: 8 questions buyers, sellers and landlords ask before choosing, plus accessibility and speed checks tied to WCAG 2.2 and Core Web Vitals. ## Key findings - Only 13% of the 133 independent real estate websites we scanned say what they charge. - A typical site answers three of the eight questions buyers, sellers and landlords ask before choosing (mean 3.3). - The median overall score is 75 out of 100 (mean 75). - The least-answered questions are "What will it cost me?" (13%), "Are you licensed?" (20%) and "Have you sold or managed homes like mine?" (26%). - The best-answered are "Can I see what you have for sale or rent?" (76%) and "How do I reach you or book a showing?" (60%). - By kind of business, the highest median score is 79 (independent property managers), against 74 for independent residential brokerages, 74 for solo agents and small teams and 72 for luxury boutiques. - 87% fail "Text contrast passes 4.5:1" (WCAG 1.4.3). - 78% fail "RealEstateAgent or listing structured data" (Schema.org · RealEstateAgent). - 77% fail "Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone" (Core Web Vitals · LCP). ## The questions buyers, sellers and landlords ask Share of the 133 sites that answer each question on the home page or a page it links to, least answered first. | Question | What we checked | Sites that answer | |---|---|---:| | What will it cost me? | Commission or management fee stated | 13% | | Are you licensed? | A real estate licence number is shown | 20% | | Have you sold or managed homes like mine? | Track record shown: sales, volume or doors managed | 26% | | Do you work where I live? | Areas served named, or community pages | 37% | | Do past clients vouch for you? | Reviews marked up, in a widget or quoted | 40% | | What's my home worth, or what will it rent for? | Home valuation or rental analysis offered | 58% | | How do I reach you or book a showing? | Tappable phone plus a form or showing request | 60% | | Can I see what you have for sale or rent? | Listings or rentals can be searched on the site | 76% | ## By type of site | Type | Sites | Median score (0 to 100) | |---|---:|---:| | Independent residential brokerages | 46 | 74 | | Solo agents and small teams | 22 | 74 | | Independent property managers | 47 | 79 | | Luxury boutiques | 18 | 72 | ## Accessibility and speed | Check | Standard | Sites that fail | |---|---|---:| | Text contrast passes 4.5:1 | WCAG 1.4.3 | 87% | | RealEstateAgent or listing structured data | Schema.org · RealEstateAgent | 78% | | Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone | Core Web Vitals · LCP | 77% | | Images have text descriptions | WCAG 1.1.1 | 29% | ## What this means for agencies For small agencies and freelancers who sell websites to independent brokerages, agent teams and property managers. We scanned 133 of their websites: 2% score under 60 out of 100, and 86% leave at least three of the questions buyers, sellers and landlords ask unanswered. Here is where the winnable work is, which problems to lead a pitch with, and how to show them without days of spec design. ### Who is realistic to win Luxury boutiques are the most winnable clients: the lowest median score (72/100), and 0% score under 60. | Type | Sites | Median score | Under 60 | |---|---:|---:|---:| | Independent residential brokerages | 46 | 74 | 4% | | Solo agents and small teams | 22 | 74 | 0% | | Independent property managers | 47 | 79 | 0% | | Luxury boutiques | 18 | 72 | 0% | ### 5 fixable problems to lead a pitch with 1. **What will it cost me?** (87% of sites, content). Fix: Say plainly how the firm is paid: commission or flat fee and what it covers, or the management and leasing fees. Pitch: "Since buyer agreements became the norm, clients ask what you charge first, and your site does not say." 2. **Text contrast passes 4.5:1** (87% of sites, quick fix). Fix: Raise text contrast to at least 4.5:1, especially text laid over hero photos. Pitch: "Parts of the site are hard to read, and it is a WCAG failure." 3. **Are you licensed?** (80% of sites, quick fix). Fix: Show the broker of record and each agent’s licence number in the footer and on agent pages. Pitch: "A careful client checks the licence first, and your site makes them look it up elsewhere." 4. **RealEstateAgent or listing structured data** (78% of sites, quick fix). Fix: Add RealEstateAgent structured data with the firm’s name, address, phone and areas served. Pitch: "Search engines and assistants have to guess who you are and where you work." 5. **Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone** (77% of sites, build). Fix: Resize and compress the hero photo, defer the listing-search scripts, aim for under 2.5 s on a phone. Pitch: "Your home page takes several seconds to appear on a buyer’s phone at the curb." ### How to show a prospect their problems and a redesign 1. **Lead with their problem, not your services.** Open with one question the site fails, for example "What will it cost me?" (87% of sites in this report miss it), and show the exact page where the answer should be. 2. **Put a number on it.** Compare their site with the sector: across 133 independent brokerages, agent teams and property managers sites, the median scores 75 out of 100 and answers 3 of the 8 questions buyers, sellers and landlords ask. A number travels further inside the client than an opinion. 3. **Show the fix without days of spec work.** A rough redesign that answers those questions persuades better than a proposal, but it usually costs a designer a day or two per prospect. You can sketch it by hand, or use Clikiti: the scan is free and shows any site's problems in about a minute, and paid plans draft a redesign of the home page from the prospect's own brand, from about $2.33 per pitch. ## Best in class: Build Idaho (Homes of Idaho) Solo agents and small team, Boise, ID (https://www.buildidaho.com/). Answers 7 of the 8 client questions tested; loads fast on phones and describes its images; like most sites in this study, it has yet to pass text contrast (WCAG 1.4.3); overall website score 75/100. Named as a positive example; every other site is anonymous. What it does well: - Listings or rentals can be searched on the site - Tappable phone plus a form or showing request - Areas served named, or community pages - Home valuation or rental analysis offered - Track record shown: sales, volume or doors managed - A real estate licence number is shown - Reviews marked up, in a widget or quoted - Real phone visitors see the main content in 2.3 s (Chrome UX Report, 75th percentile; good is 2.5 s or less) - Every image has a text description (WCAG 1.1.1) - Clikiti pillar scores of 90 or more: accessibility 98 Where it could still improve: - Not found on the home page or the pages it links to: commission or management fee stated - Speed pillar 55/100 (driven by the throttled mobile Lighthouse run; real phone visitors load it fast) ## Method - **Sample:** 133 independent real estate websites (46 independent residential brokerages, 22 solo agents and small teams, 47 independent property managers, 18 luxury boutiques). - **When:** scanned October 2026; published 2026-10-15. - **How:** the questions are read from the served HTML of each home page and the pages it links to. Load time, contrast and image descriptions come from Google Lighthouse (PageSpeed Insights) in a phone and a desktop render, with Chrome UX Report real-user data where it exists. A check passes only when the scan finds it; each check cites the standard it comes from. - **Score:** Clikiti's overall website score (rubric v2): usability 30%, speed 25%, accessibility 25%, SEO 10%, trust 10%. It measures the website, not the independent real estate. The questions are reported separately and do not feed it. - **Margin of error:** shares are exact for the sites scanned. Read as estimates for all independent real estate websites, they carry a margin of error of up to ±8.5 percentage points at 95% confidence (worst case, p = 0.5, n = 133). - **Privacy:** results are published as aggregates or anonymously. Sites are listed by name in the appendix with no individual results; only the best-in-class example is named with its results. ## License and citation Free to use and cite under CC BY 4.0. Credit Clikiti with a link. License: [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). APA: Clikiti. (2026, October 15). The state of independent real estate websites 2026 (Q4 2026) [Report]. https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4 Embed the chart (HTML): ```html
Chart: share of independent real estate websites answering each question buyers, sellers and landlords ask (Q4 2026)
Source: Clikiti, The State of Independent Real Estate Websites 2026 (Q4 2026). CC BY 4.0.
``` ## Links - Full report with charts: https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4 - PDF: https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4/report.pdf - Aggregate data (JSON): https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4/data.json - Aggregate data (CSV): https://clikiti.com/research/realestate/2026-q4/data.csv - All Clikiti research: https://clikiti.com/research - Scan your own site free: https://clikiti.com/ Clikiti scans websites for usability, accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA) and speed, and helps small agencies and freelancers show prospects their problems and a redesign without days of spec work. ## Appendix A: Methodology 133 websites, 4 types of organisation, 36 states, read on 2026-10-14 to 2026-10-15. Margin of error ±8.5 points at 95% confidence. ### A1. The research question When someone wants to buy, sell or rent out a home and looks up an independent agent, brokerage or property manager online, usually on a phone, can they search what is for sale or rent, reach the business or ask for a showing, tell whether it works in their area, get a home valuation or rental analysis, see a track record, check a licence number, find out what it charges and see whether past clients vouch for it? Population: Independently owned US residential real estate businesses with their own website, in four groups: independent residential brokerages, solo agents and small teams, independent property managers, and luxury boutiques. These are the real estate businesses a small or mid-size web agency can realistically win as clients. ### A2. Who was studied | Source | What it contributes | Sites | |---|---|---:| | Local search, independent brokerages | Independently owned residential brokerages found in local search results and brokerage directories, city by city | 85 | | Local search, agents and teams | Solo agents and small teams with their own website, found in local search results, city by city | 25 | | Local search, property managers | Independently owned residential property management companies found in local search results, city by city | 45 | | Local search, luxury boutiques | Independent brokerages and teams that market themselves as luxury or fine homes specialists, found in local search results, city by city | 17 | Included: - An independently owned brokerage, team or property manager with its own website (not a directory, portal or social profile) - Based in the United States - Home page responds and shows the business it claims to be (each home page title was checked before scanning) Excluded: - Franchise and national brokerages and their affiliates and agents (for example Keller Williams, RE/MAX, Coldwell Banker, Century 21, ERA, Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate, Compass, eXp, Real Brokerage, Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices, Sotheby's International Realty, Engel & Völkers, Howard Hanna, Douglas Elliman, Weichert, Redfin), whose agents' sites are templates - Portals and lead-generation sites (Zillow, Realtor.com, Homes.com, Trulia) - National and franchised property managers (for example Real Property Management, Mynd, Evernest, Greystar, Pathlight, Renters Warehouse, Mavis) and any business with offices in several states - Agent pages hosted on a franchise or portal domain - Parked, placeholder, password-protected or unreachable sites, and duplicates | From list to sample | Sites | |---|---:| | Candidates listed (each home page answered automated visitors when listed) | 151 | | Removed at editorial review: offices in several states or very large (3) | -3 | | Removed at editorial review: brokerage services provided by a franchise (1) | -1 | | Removed at editorial review: a hijacked domain serving hidden gambling links (1) | -1 | | Removed at screening: a bot check or an empty page served instead of the site (4) | -4 | | Cohort | 142 | | Not scanned: one site refused the scanner and one could not be scanned (2) | -2 | | Removed because Google returned no phone speed test for the site (7) | -7 | | Studied in this edition | 133 | | Region (US Census) | Independent residential brokerages | Solo agents and small teams | Independent property managers | Luxury boutiques | All | |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:| | Northeast | 13 | 6 | 12 | 4 | 35 | | Midwest | 10 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 31 | | South | 10 | 6 | 14 | 5 | 35 | | West | 13 | 4 | 11 | 4 | 32 | ### A3. How the sites were read - Pages: The home page, then for each of nine topics (listings or rentals, home valuation, sold or track record, agents or team, about, reviews, areas or communities, fees or services, contact) the best-matching link on the home page. - Speed and accessibility: Google PageSpeed Insights (Lighthouse) on a mid-range phone profile and on desktop, plus Chrome UX Report data from real visitors over the previous 28 days where Google publishes it for the site. - Crawler conduct: One request at a time to each site, at least 400 ms apart, at most ten pages per site; robots.txt is read and obeyed for every page requested; a site that refuses is left out and never retried. User agent: `Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ClikitiResearch/1.0; +https://clikiti.com)`. ### A4. What was measured | Question | Counts as answered when | Standard | |---|---|---| | Can I see what you have for sale or rent? (Listings or rentals can be searched on the site) | Listings or available rentals can be searched or browsed on the business's own site: a link to a listings, property search or rentals page on its own domain or on its branded listing-search (IDX) or rental-listing service, or such a search embedded in a page. A link that sends the visitor to a portal (Zillow, Realtor.com, Homes.com) does not count. | Clikiti customer question 1 of 8 | | How do I reach you or book a showing? (Tappable phone plus a form or showing request) | The home page has a tappable phone link, and the home or contact page carries a contact form, or a link that requests a showing, a tour or a consultation online. | Clikiti customer question 2 of 8 | | Do you work where I live? (Areas served named, or community pages) | The site links to community, neighbourhood or areas-served pages, or names three or more towns or neighbourhoods it serves. | Clikiti customer question 3 of 8 | | What's my home worth, or what will it rent for? (Home valuation or rental analysis offered) | The site offers a home valuation (what's my home worth, a market analysis or a home value estimate) or, for property managers, a rental analysis or rent estimate. | Clikiti customer question 4 of 8 | | Have you sold or managed homes like mine? (Track record shown: sales, volume or doors managed) | The site shows a track record: a sold or past-sales page, a count of homes sold or closed, a sales volume, or, for property managers, a count of homes, doors or units managed. | Clikiti customer question 5 of 8 | | Are you licensed? (A real estate licence number is shown) | A real estate licence number is shown (for example 'DRE #01234567', 'License #', 'Lic. No.') on the home, about, agents or contact page. | Clikiti customer question 6 of 8 | | What will it cost me? (Commission or management fee stated) | A fee is stated: a commission or listing fee as a percentage or dollar amount, or, for property managers, a management, leasing or tenant-placement fee. | Clikiti customer question 7 of 8 | | Do past clients vouch for you? (Reviews marked up, in a widget or quoted) | Client reviews are marked up for search engines (Review or AggregateRating structured data), shown through a review widget, or at least two client testimonials are quoted. | Clikiti customer question 8 of 8 | | Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone (Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone) | Real visitors on phones see the main content within 2.5 seconds (Chrome UX Report, 75th percentile). Where Google publishes no visitor data, the phone lab test is used. | Core Web Vitals · LCP | | Text contrast passes 4.5:1 (Text contrast passes 4.5:1) | No text on the home page fails the WCAG 1.4.3 minimum contrast of 4.5:1, in either the phone or desktop test. | WCAG 1.4.3 | | Images have text descriptions (Images have text descriptions) | Every meaningful image on the home page has a text description (WCAG 1.1.1). | WCAG 1.1.1 | | RealEstateAgent or listing structured data (RealEstateAgent or listing structured data) | The site describes the business to search engines with RealEstateAgent, RealEstateListing or a similar real estate structured-data type. | Schema.org · RealEstateAgent | ### A5. The website score Clikiti website score, rubric 2.0.0: a weighted mean of usability 30%, speed 25%, accessibility 25%, search 10% and trust 10%. It measures the website, not the organisation; the questions above do not feed it. Report-card letters: A 90+, B 75+, C 45+, D 30+, F below 30. ### A6. Precision ±8.5 points overall at 95% confidence (worst case p = 0.5, 1.96 × √(0.25/n)); by type: independent residential brokerages ±14.4 (n = 46); solo agents and small teams ±20.9 (n = 22); independent property managers ±14.3 (n = 47); luxury boutiques ±23.1 (n = 18). ### A7. Quality control - Every home page in the cohort was fetched and its title checked against the listed business before scanning - Every home page was checked for gambling, pharmacy, adult and crypto spam (hijacked domains) before scanning - Detection rules were checked against the evidence they record for a sample of businesses in every group, and revised before the final run - Every published figure is recomputed from the data at build time, and a statement in the text that the data does not support stops the build - Results are published only after automated checks for missing data, anonymity, accessibility of the report itself and the margin of error statement pass ### A8. Limitations - A point-in-time snapshot: sites change, and a site may have improved or declined since it was read. - Only public pages were read: the home page and pages it links to. Listing-search tools, saved searches, chat widgets and multi-step valuation forms were not tested. - Answers are read from the page as a server delivers it. Content that only appears after scripts run in the browser (many listing searches, valuation tools and review widgets) is not seen unless the page links to it or loads it by name, which the study counts as a gap a search engine or a slow phone would also meet. - Licence-number display rules differ by state; the study reports whether a number is shown, not whether a business meets its state's advertising rules. - The study reports what a website shows. It does not judge any agent, brokerage, property manager, listing or price, or compliance with any licensing, advertising or fair housing rule. - Automated accessibility tests find only part of what WCAG covers; keyboard and screen-reader use need a manual audit. - The sample is a structured list of real, independent businesses, not a random draw. Margins of error are given as a guide to precision, not as a guarantee that the results hold for every business in the country. ## Appendix B: businesses in this study Who was scanned, and nothing more: results are shown only in aggregate or anonymously. ### Independent residential brokerages (46) - [Baroody Real Estate LLC](https://baroodyrealestate.com/), Manchester, NH - [Blakemore Real Estate](https://www.blakemorerealestate.com/), Salt Lake City, UT - [Blue Sierra Realty](https://bluesierrarealty.com/), Reno, NV - [Bozeman Brokers Real Estate](https://bozemanbrokers.com/), Bozeman, MT - [cityhome COLLECTIVE](https://cityhomecollective.com/), Salt Lake City, UT - [Divine Investments](https://www.divineinvestments.com/), Providence, RI - [Dunes Properties](https://dunesproperties.com/), Charleston, SC - [Fridrich & Clark Realty](https://fridrichandclark.com/), Nashville, TN - [Future Home Realty](https://www.futurehomerealty.com/), Tampa, FL - [Gabler Realty](https://gablerrealty.com/), Delmar (Albany), NY - [Gant Hill & Associates](https://ganthill.com/), Louisville, KY - [Good Living Indy](https://www.goodlivingindy.com/), Indianapolis, IN - [Gottesman Residential](https://gottesmanresidential.com/), Austin, TX - [Greenridge Realty](https://www.greenridge.com/), Grand Rapids, MI - [HI Pro Realty](https://www.hiprorealty.com/), Honolulu, HI - [Highgarden Real Estate](https://highgarden.com/), Indianapolis, IN - [Jamison Company Real Estate](https://jamisoncompany.com/), Sioux Falls, SD - [JBGoodwin REALTORS](https://jbgoodwin.com/), Austin, TX - [Joseph Walter Realty](https://www.myjwr.com/), Columbus, OH - [Judge Realty](https://judgerealty.com/), Savannah, GA - [KC Local Homes](https://www.kclocalhomes.com/), Kansas City, MO - [Kentucky Select Properties](https://www.kyselectproperties.com/), Louisville, KY - [Kingsway Realty](https://kingswayrealty.com/), Lancaster, PA - [Lifespace Real Estate](https://lifespacerealestate.com/), Pittsburgh, PA - [Living Room Realty](https://www.livingroomre.com/), Portland, OR - [Locations LLC](https://www.locationshawaii.com/), Honolulu, HI - [Maywright Property Co.](https://maywright.com/), Indianapolis, IN - [Myers & Myers Real Estate](https://myersandmyersrealestate.com/), Albuquerque, NM - [Northbound Realty Co.](https://northboundre.com/), West Boylston (Worcester), MA - [One Valley Realty](https://onevalleyrealty.com/), Allentown, PA - [Paris Group Realty](https://www.parisgrouprealty.com/), Portland, OR - [Parsons Real Estate Group](https://www.parsonsohio.com/), Columbus, OH - [Peloquin Realty & Property Management](https://www.peloquinrealty.com/), Manchester, NH - [Pilkerton Realtors](https://www.pilkertonrealestate.com/), Nashville, TN - [PowerHaus Real Estate](https://www.powerhausrealestate.com/), Boise, ID - [Ralston Group Properties](https://www.ralstongroupproperties.com/), Boise, ID - [Rockwood Realty Group](https://rockwoodrealtygroup.com/), Madison, WI - [Seabury Hill Realtors](https://www.seaburyhill.com/), New Haven, CT - [Serota Real Estate LLC](https://serotarealestatellc.com/), Buffalo, NY - [Silvercreek Realty Group](https://www.silvercreekrealty.com/), Boise, ID - [Spyglass Realty](https://www.spyglassrealty.com/), Austin, TX - [Stanton Company Realtors](https://stantonrealtors.com/), Montclair, NJ - [Stellar Realty Northwest](https://stellarrealtynw.com/), Bend, OR - [Tea Leaf Realty](https://tealeafrealty.com/), West Hartford, CT - [Vitalius Real Estate Group](https://vitalius.com/), Portland, ME - [WB Realty Co.](https://www.wbrealty.com/), West Des Moines, IA ### Solo agents and small teams (22) - [Agentry Real Estate](https://agentryrealestate.com/), Tampa, FL - [Amy Stockberger Real Estate](https://www.amystockberger.com/), Sioux Falls, SD - [Bainbridge Realty Group](https://bainbridgerealtygroup.com/), Nashville, TN - [Build Idaho (Homes of Idaho)](https://www.buildidaho.com/), Boise, ID - [Buyers Brokers of the Seacoast](https://www.buyersbrokersoftheseacoast.com/), Portsmouth, NH - [Caperton Realty](https://www.capertonrealty.com/), Louisville, KY - [Elevate Realty Group](https://www.elevateupstate.com/), Rochester, NY - [Epperson Realty Group](https://eppersonrealtygroup.com/), Austin, TX - [Foxway Realty](https://www.foxwayrealty.com/), Ann Arbor, MI - [Graham Realtors](https://www.grahamrealtors.com/), Wichita, KS - [Handsome Properties](https://handsomeproperties.com/), Charleston, SC - [Hawaii Realty International (American Dream Realty)](https://www.hawaiireal.com/), Honolulu, HI - [Jared Erhart Real Estate Team](https://www.jarederhart.com/), Bethlehem (Allentown), PA - [Lehigh Valley Just Listed](https://www.lehighvalleyjustlisted.com/), Northampton (Allentown), PA - [Maywalt Realty Group](https://www.maywalt.com/), Buffalo, NY - [Oak Street Real Estate Group](https://www.oakstreetrealestategroup.com/), Nashville, TN - [RealABQ](https://realabq.com/), Albuquerque, NM - [Steve Volkers Group](https://www.stevevolkersgroup.com/), Grand Rapids, MI - [Templeton Real Estate Group](https://www.templetonrealestategroup.com/), Boise, ID - [The Garlick Team Boutique Real Estate](https://www.thegarlickteam.com/), Des Moines, IA - [The Hub Realty](https://thehubrealty.com/), Madison, WI - [The Nolt Team (Kingsway Realty)](https://www.thenoltteam.com/), Lancaster, PA ### Independent property managers (47) - [Aishel Real Estate](https://www.aishelrealestate.com/), Pittsburgh, PA - [Asheville Phoenix Properties](https://avlprop.com/), Asheville, NC - [Bahia Property Management](https://www.tampapropertymanagement.com/), Tampa, FL - [Baton Rouge Property Management](https://batonrougepropertymanagement.com/), Baton Rouge, LA - [Bend Property Management](https://www.bendpropertymanagement.com/), Bend, OR - [Bissonette Properties](https://www.bissonetteproperties.com/), Burlington, VT - [Bridge Home Realty](https://bridgehomerealty.com/), Pittsburgh, PA - [CCL Management](https://cclmanagement.com/), Madison, WI - [Charleston Property Company](https://www.charlestonpc.com/), Charleston, SC - [Chase Pacific Property Management](https://chasepacific.com/), San Diego, CA - [Chattanooga Property Management](https://www.chattanoogapm.com/), Chattanooga, TN - [Chauncey Property Management](https://chaunceypm.com/), Rochester, NY - [Clarke Property Management](https://clarkepropertymanagement.com/), Portland, ME - [Clements Property Management](https://clementspm.com/), Santa Barbara, CA - [Dean & DeWitt Property Management](https://deananddewitt.com/), Tampa, FL - [Fountain City Property Solutions](https://www.fountaincityps.com/), Kansas City, MO - [Frontier Property Advisors](https://frontierpropertyadvisors.com/), Portland, ME - [Great Plains Property Management](https://greatplainspm.com/), Sioux Falls, SD - [Great Richmond Rentals](https://www.greatrichmondrentals.com/), Richmond, VA - [H2 Real Estate](https://www.h2realestate.com/), Birmingham, AL - [HarborLight Property Management](https://www.harborlightpm.com/), South Portland, ME - [Hudson Residential](https://www.hudsonresidential.com/), Raleigh, NC - [Ironclad Property Management](https://ironcladpm.com/), Hartford area, CT - [Just Right Properties](https://justrightproperties.com/), Kansas City, MO - [KEEZ Property Management](https://www.keezpropertymanagement.com/), Sioux Falls, SD - [Lamplight Home Rentals](https://www.lamplighthomerentals.com/), Asheville, NC - [Mission City Property Management](https://www.missioncitypm.com/), Santa Barbara, CA - [MSP Home Rental](https://www.msphomerental.com/), Minneapolis, MN - [Parkville Management](https://parkvillemanagement.com/), Hartford, CT - [Portland Pioneer Properties](https://www.portlandpioneerproperties.com/), Portland, OR - [Portland Property Management Inc](https://www.portlandpm.com/), Portland, OR - [Qwest Property Management](https://www.qwestpm.com/), Grand Rapids, MI - [Realty Performance Group](https://realtyperformancegroup.com/), Rochester, NY - [Robert C. White & Company](https://www.robertcwhite.com/), West Hartford, CT - [RVA Property Management](https://www.rvapm.com/), Richmond, VA - [San Diego Professional Property Managers](https://www.sdppm.com/), San Diego, CA - [Smart Move Property Management](https://www.smartmovepm.com/), Boise, ID - [Stone Oak Property Management](https://www.stoneoakpropertymanagement.com/), San Antonio, TX - [Texas Best Property Management](https://texasbestpm.com/), Austin, TX - [Tiner Properties](https://www.tiner.com/), Sacramento, CA - [TradeMark Residential](https://trademarkresidential.com/), Raleigh, NC - [True Home Ohio Property Management](https://www.truehomeohio.com/), Cincinnati, OH - [United Properties of West Michigan](https://www.rentupm.com/), Grand Rapids, MI - [URHome Property Management](https://www.urhomepm.com/), Portland, OR - [West Ridge Property Management](https://westridgepm.com/), Portland, OR - [Wilmoth Group](https://www.wilmothgroup.com/), Indianapolis, IN - [Zona Properties](https://www.zonaproperties.com/), Rochester, NY ### Luxury boutiques (18) - [Carriage Properties](https://carriageprop.com/), Charleston, SC - [Eric Moreland Group](https://ericmorelandgroup.com/), Austin, TX - [Freeland Realty Group](https://www.freelandrealtygroup.com/), Columbus, OH - [Gladys Manion Real Estate](https://gladysmanion.com/), St. Louis, MO - [Great Island Realty](https://www.greatislandrealty.com/), Portsmouth, NH - [Janet McAfee Real Estate](https://janetmcafee.com/), St. Louis, MO - [Kopf Hunter & Haas Realtors](https://khhrealtors.com/), Cincinnati, OH - [Leyendecker Luxury Real Estate](https://leyendeckerluxury.com/), Minneapolis, MN - [LUXE Forbes Global Properties](https://luxeoregon.com/), Portland, OR - [Moreland Properties](https://moreland.com/), Austin, TX - [Pam Harrington Exclusives](https://pamharringtonexclusives.com/), Charleston, SC - [Phyllis Browning Company](https://www.phyllisbrowning.com/), San Antonio, TX - [Pursuit Real Estate](https://pursuitvt.com/), Burlington, VT - [Riskin Partners Estate Group](https://montecito-realestate.com/), Santa Barbara, CA - [Santa Barbara Brokers](https://santabarbarabrokers.com/), Santa Barbara, CA - [Town & Shore Real Estate](https://townandshore.com/), Portland, ME - [Village Properties](https://villagesite.com/), Santa Barbara, CA - [Watch Hill Properties](https://www.watchhillproperties.com/), Westerly, RI ## Disclaimer This report is based on automated scans of publicly available home pages, and pages they link to, run on 2026-10-14 to 2026-10-15. Its findings are a point-in-time technical snapshot of each website. They are not a judgement of any agent's service, any listing, any price or anyone's licensing status, and automated checks may contain errors. This report is not a judgement of the quality of any agent, brokerage, property manager, listing or price, and it does not assess compliance with any real estate licensing, advertising or fair housing rule. Clikiti is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, any business listed here; trademarks belong to their owners. The report is provided "as is" under CC BY 4.0, without warranty of any kind. Photographs are illustrations created with generative AI; every person shown is fictional. The usability review is carried out by an automated vision model under the rules in A5. **[Remove my business from this study](mailto:hello@clikiti.com?subject=Remove%20my%20business%20from%20the%20State%20of%20Independent%20Real%20Estate%20Websites%20study&body=Please%20remove%20my%20business%20from%20this%20study.%0A%0ABusiness%20name%3A%0ABusiness%20website%3A%0AMy%20role%20at%20the%20business%3A%0AHow%20to%20contact%20me%3A)** We review every request and reply when it's done; removed businesses are excluded from future editions.