---
title: "The State of Independent Accountant Websites 2026"
description: "Selling websites to small CPA firms, bookkeepers and tax preparers? We scanned 158 of their sites: only 13% show any price, package or fee. Median score 77/100. The fixable problems to pitch, Q4 2026."
edition: "Q4 2026"
date_published: 2026-10-15
date_modified: 2026-10-15
author: Clikiti
canonical_url: https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4
pdf: https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4/report.pdf
data: https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4/data.json
data_csv: https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4/data.csv
license: "CC BY 4.0"
license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
attribution: "Clikiti, The State of Independent Accountant Websites 2026 (Q4 2026), https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4"
audience: "Web agencies and freelancers selling to small CPA firms, bookkeepers and tax preparers"
sample_size: 158
margin_of_error: "up to ±7.8 percentage points (95% confidence)"
data_source: automated scans of real websites
---

# The State of Independent Accountant Websites 2026 (Q4 2026)

**Answer:** Only 13% of the 158 independent accounting, bookkeeping and tax practice websites we scanned show any price, package or fee.

*Free to use and cite under CC BY 4.0. Credit Clikiti with a link.* For small agencies and freelancers who sell websites to small CPA firms, bookkeepers and tax preparers. We scanned 158 of their websites: 1% score under 60 out of 100, and 97% leave at least three of the questions clients ask unanswered. Here is where the winnable work is, which problems to lead a pitch with, and how to show them without days of spec design.

Clikiti scanned 158 independent accounting, bookkeeping and tax practice websites in October 2026 and checked each one against 13 checks: 9 questions clients ask before choosing, plus accessibility and speed checks tied to WCAG 2.2 and Core Web Vitals.

## Key findings

- Only 13% of the 158 independent accounting, bookkeeping and tax practice websites we scanned show any price, package or fee.
- A typical site answers three of the nine questions clients ask before choosing (mean 3.2).
- The median overall score is 77 out of 100 (mean 77).
- The least-answered questions are "What will it cost me?" (13%), "Can I book a first call without phoning?" (15%) and "How do I send my documents safely?" (23%).
- The best-answered are "What do you do?" (80%) and "Where are you, and how do I reach you?" (46%).
- Bookkeeping firms have the highest median score (79), against 77 for small cpa firms, 77 for advisory and fractional cfo and 75 for tax preparers and enrolled agents.
- 95% fail "Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone" (Core Web Vitals · LCP).
- 82% fail "AccountingService structured data" (Schema.org · AccountingService).
- 78% fail "Text contrast passes 4.5:1" (WCAG 1.4.3).
- Bookkeeping firms show a price more often than CPA firms.
- Kinds of practice differ in median score by at least 3 points.

## The questions clients ask

Share of the 158 sites that answer each question on the home page or a page it links to, least answered first.

| Question | What we checked | Sites that answer |
|---|---|---:|
| What will it cost me? | A price, package or fee shown | 13% |
| Can I book a first call without phoning? | Book a consultation online | 15% |
| How do I send my documents safely? | A working secure client portal | 23% |
| Do other clients vouch for you? | Reviews marked up, shown or quoted | 31% |
| Who will I actually work with? | People named with a short bio | 32% |
| Is someone qualified doing my books? | A named CPA, EA or certified bookkeeper | 35% |
| Do you know businesses like mine? | Industries or client types named | 44% |
| Where are you, and how do I reach you? | Tappable phone plus a street address | 46% |
| What do you do? | Four or more services named | 80% |

## By type of site

| Type | Sites | Median score (0 to 100) |
|---|---:|---:|
| Small CPA firms | 30 | 77 |
| Bookkeeping firms | 43 | 79 |
| Tax preparers and enrolled agents | 41 | 75 |
| Advisory and fractional CFO | 44 | 77 |

## Accessibility and speed

| Check | Standard | Sites that fail |
|---|---|---:|
| Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone | Core Web Vitals · LCP | 95% |
| AccountingService structured data | Schema.org · AccountingService | 82% |
| Text contrast passes 4.5:1 | WCAG 1.4.3 | 78% |
| Images have text descriptions | WCAG 1.1.1 | 23% |

## What this means for agencies

For small agencies and freelancers who sell websites to small CPA firms, bookkeepers and tax preparers. We scanned 158 of their websites: 1% score under 60 out of 100, and 97% leave at least three of the questions clients ask unanswered. Here is where the winnable work is, which problems to lead a pitch with, and how to show them without days of spec design.

### Who is realistic to win

Tax preparers and enrolled agents are the most winnable clients: the lowest median score (75/100), and 0% score under 60.

| Type | Sites | Median score | Under 60 |
|---|---:|---:|---:|
| Small CPA firms | 30 | 77 | 0% |
| Bookkeeping firms | 43 | 79 | 0% |
| Tax preparers and enrolled agents | 41 | 75 | 0% |
| Advisory and fractional CFO | 44 | 77 | 2% |

### 5 fixable problems to lead a pitch with

1. **Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone** (95% of sites, build). Fix: Resize and compress the hero image, defer scripts, aim for under 2.5 s on a phone. Pitch: "Your home page takes several seconds to appear on a client's phone."
2. **What will it cost me?** (87% of sites, content). Fix: Publish starting prices or monthly packages for the common work: a personal return, a business return, monthly bookkeeping. Pitch: "The first thing a new client wants to know is what it will cost, and your site makes them call to ask."
3. **Can I book a first call without phoning?** (85% of sites, build). Fix: Embed an online scheduler for a first consultation, linked from the home and contact pages. Pitch: "A prospect who finds you at 10 pm cannot book a first call without phoning in the morning."
4. **AccountingService structured data** (82% of sites, quick fix). Fix: Add AccountingService structured data with the practice's name, address, phone and services. Pitch: "Search engines and AI assistants have to guess what your practice does and where it is."
5. **Text contrast passes 4.5:1** (78% of sites, quick fix). Fix: Raise text contrast to at least 4.5:1 in the theme. Pitch: "Parts of the site are hard to read, especially for older clients, and it is a WCAG failure."

### How to show a prospect their problems and a redesign

1. **Lead with their problem, not your services.** Open with one question the site fails, for example loads in under 2.5 s on a phone (95% of sites in this report miss it), and show the exact page where the answer should be.
2. **Put a number on it.** Compare their site with the sector: across 158 small CPA firms, bookkeepers and tax preparers sites, the median scores 77 out of 100 and answers 3 of the 9 questions clients ask. A number travels further inside the client than an opinion.
3. **Show the fix without days of spec work.** A rough redesign that answers those questions persuades better than a proposal, but it usually costs a designer a day or two per prospect. You can sketch it by hand, or use Clikiti: the scan is free and shows any site's problems in about a minute, and paid plans draft a redesign of the home page from the prospect's own brand, from about $2.33 per pitch.

## Method

- **Sample:** 158 independent accounting, bookkeeping and tax practice websites (30 small cpa firms, 43 bookkeeping firms, 41 tax preparers and enrolled agents, 44 advisory and fractional cfo).
- **When:** scanned October 2026; published 2026-10-15.
- **How:** the questions are read from the served HTML of each home page and the pages it links to. Load time, contrast and image descriptions come from Google Lighthouse (PageSpeed Insights) in a phone and a desktop render, with Chrome UX Report real-user data where it exists. A check passes only when the scan finds it; each check cites the standard it comes from.
- **Score:** Clikiti's overall website score (rubric v2): usability 30%, speed 25%, accessibility 25%, SEO 10%, trust 10%. It measures the website, not the independent accounting, bookkeeping and tax practice. The questions are reported separately and do not feed it.
- **Margin of error:** shares are exact for the sites scanned. Read as estimates for all independent accounting, bookkeeping and tax practice websites, they carry a margin of error of up to ±7.8 percentage points at 95% confidence (worst case, p = 0.5, n = 158).
- **Privacy:** results are published as aggregates or anonymously. Sites are listed by name in the appendix with no individual results; only the best-in-class example is named with its results.

## License and citation

Free to use and cite under CC BY 4.0. Credit Clikiti with a link. License: [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

APA: Clikiti. (2026, October 15). The state of independent accountant websites 2026 (Q4 2026) [Report]. https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4

Embed the chart (HTML):

```html
<figure style="margin:0;max-width:720px"><a href="https://clikiti.com/research/accountants"><img src="https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4/chart.png" alt="Chart: share of independent accounting, bookkeeping and tax practice websites answering each question clients ask (Q4 2026)" width="1200" height="675" style="width:100%;height:auto"></a><figcaption style="font:13px/1.4 sans-serif">Source: <a href="https://clikiti.com/research/accountants">Clikiti, The State of Independent Accountant Websites 2026</a> (Q4 2026). <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" rel="license">CC BY 4.0</a>.</figcaption></figure>
```

## Links

- Full report with charts: https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4
- PDF: https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4/report.pdf
- Aggregate data (JSON): https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4/data.json
- Aggregate data (CSV): https://clikiti.com/research/accountants/2026-q4/data.csv
- All Clikiti research: https://clikiti.com/research
- Scan your own site free: https://clikiti.com/

Clikiti scans websites for usability, accessibility (WCAG 2.2 AA) and speed, and helps small agencies and freelancers show prospects their problems and a redesign without days of spec work.

## Appendix A: Methodology

158 websites, 4 types of organisation, 47 states, read on 2026-10-15. Margin of error ±7.8 points at 95% confidence.

### A1. The research question

When a business owner or a household looks a small accounting practice up online, can they find out what it does, roughly what it costs, who is qualified to do the work, whether it knows their kind of business, how to send documents safely, how to book a first conversation, who they would work with, whether other clients vouch for it and where it is and how to reach it?

Population: Independently owned US accounting practices with one to three offices and their own website, in four groups: small CPA firms, bookkeeping firms, individual tax preparers and enrolled agents, and small-business advisory and fractional CFO firms. These are the practices a small or mid-size web agency can realistically win as clients.

### A2. Who was studied

| Source | What it contributes | Sites |
|---|---|---:|
| Local search, CPA firms | Small independent CPA firms (about 1 to 20 staff) found in local search results and state CPA society directories, city by city | 18 |
| Local search, bookkeeping | Independent bookkeeping firms and bookkeepers found in local search results, city by city | 24 |
| Local search, tax preparation | Independent tax preparers and enrolled agents found in local search results and preparer directories, city by city | 21 |
| Local search, advisory and fractional CFO | Small local and regional advisory, outsourced controller and fractional CFO firms found in local search results, city by city | 33 |

Included:
- An independently owned accounting, bookkeeping, tax or advisory practice with one to three offices and its own website (not a directory, marketplace or social profile)
- Based in the United States
- Home page responds and shows the business it claims to be (each home page title was checked before scanning)

Excluded:
- The Big Four and every firm on the Accounting Today Top 100 list, and any firm with four or more offices or offices in several states
- Firms owned by or merged into a private-equity-backed platform or national roll-up
- Franchises (for example H&R Block, Jackson Hewitt, Liberty Tax, Padgett, Fiducial, Ledgers)
- Online-only national services (for example Bench, Pilot, 1-800Accountant, inDinero)
- Directories, marketplaces and lead-generation pages, financial planners whose main business is investments, payroll companies and software vendors
- Parked, placeholder, password-protected, hijacked or unreachable sites, and duplicates

| From list to sample | Sites |
|---|---:|
| Candidates listed | 180 |
| Removed at screening: the site's robots.txt refuses research crawlers (19) | -19 |
| Removed at editorial review: a hijacked domain serving unrelated spam links (1) | -1 |
| Cohort | 160 |

| Region (US Census) | Small CPA firms | Bookkeeping firms | Tax preparers and enrolled agents | Advisory and fractional CFO | All |
|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|
| Northeast | 6 | 11 | 10 | 11 | 38 |
| Midwest | 9 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 40 |
| South | 8 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 42 |
| West | 7 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 38 |

### A3. How the sites were read

- Pages: The home page, then for each of eight topics (services, pricing, industries, team, about, reviews, client portal and booking, contact) the best-matching link on the home page.
- Speed and accessibility: Google PageSpeed Insights (Lighthouse) on a mid-range phone profile and on desktop, plus Chrome UX Report data from real visitors over the previous 28 days where Google publishes it for the site.
- Crawler conduct: One request at a time to each site, at least 400 ms apart, at most ten pages per site; robots.txt is read and obeyed for every page requested; a site that refuses is left out and never retried. User agent: `Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; ClikitiResearch/1.0; +https://clikiti.com)`.

### A4. What was measured

| Question | Counts as answered when | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| What do you do? (Four or more services named) | Four or more distinct accounting services are named on the home or services page (for example tax preparation, bookkeeping, payroll, audit or review, IRS representation, advisory, entity formation). | Clikiti client question 1 of 9 |
| What will it cost me? (A price, package or fee shown) | A dollar price is shown for a named service, a return, a monthly package or an hourly rate (revenue thresholds, refunds, tax savings and penalties do not count). | Clikiti client question 2 of 9 |
| Is someone qualified doing my books? (A named CPA, EA or certified bookkeeper) | A named person is shown with a professional credential: CPA, EA (enrolled agent), CMA, a certified bookkeeper title or a QuickBooks or Xero certification. | Clikiti client question 3 of 9 |
| Do you know businesses like mine? (Industries or client types named) | The site names the kinds of clients it specialises in: an industries or who-we-serve page, or three or more industries named on the home, services or about page. | Clikiti client question 4 of 9 |
| How do I send my documents safely? (A working secure client portal) | A link to, or an embed of, a secure client portal or file-upload service for this practice (a portal provider's own home page, or a portal link that leads nowhere, does not count). | Clikiti client question 5 of 9 |
| Can I book a first call without phoning? (Book a consultation online) | A link to, or an embed of, an online scheduler lets the visitor pick a time for a consultation or appointment (a request form alone does not count). | Clikiti client question 6 of 9 |
| Who will I actually work with? (People named with a short bio) | At least one person who works at the practice is named with a short biography on the team or about page. | Clikiti client question 7 of 9 |
| Do other clients vouch for you? (Reviews marked up, shown or quoted) | Client reviews are marked up for search engines (Review or AggregateRating structured data), shown through a review widget, or at least two client testimonials are quoted. | Clikiti client question 8 of 9 |
| Where are you, and how do I reach you? (Tappable phone plus a street address) | The home page has a tappable phone link, and a street address with a ZIP code (or an embedded map) appears on the home, contact or about page. | Clikiti client question 9 of 9 |
| Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone (Loads in under 2.5 s on a phone) | Real visitors on phones see the main content within 2.5 seconds (Chrome UX Report, 75th percentile). Where Google publishes no visitor data, the phone lab test is used. | Core Web Vitals · LCP |
| Text contrast passes 4.5:1 (Text contrast passes 4.5:1) | No text on the home page fails the WCAG 1.4.3 minimum contrast of 4.5:1, in either the phone or desktop test. | WCAG 1.4.3 |
| Images have text descriptions (Images have text descriptions) | Every meaningful image on the home page has a text description (WCAG 1.1.1). | WCAG 1.1.1 |
| AccountingService structured data (AccountingService structured data) | The site describes the business to search engines with AccountingService or FinancialService structured data. | Schema.org · AccountingService |

### A5. The website score

Clikiti website score, rubric 2.0.0: a weighted mean of usability 30%, speed 25%, accessibility 25%, search 10% and trust 10%. It measures the website, not the organisation; the questions above do not feed it. Report-card letters: A 90+, B 75+, C 45+, D 30+, F below 30.

### A6. Precision

±7.8 points overall at 95% confidence (worst case p = 0.5, 1.96 × √(0.25/n)); by type: small cpa firms ±17.9 (n = 30); bookkeeping firms ±14.9 (n = 43); tax preparers and enrolled agents ±15.3 (n = 41); advisory and fractional cfo ±14.8 (n = 44).

### A7. Quality control

- Every home page in the cohort was fetched and its title checked against the listed business before scanning
- Every home page was checked for unrelated spam content (gambling, pharmacy, adult, crypto) that would mark a hijacked domain
- Sites built on accounting-industry website templates were identified, because templated portal links and boilerplate content can make a site look more complete than it is; portal links were followed to check they lead to a real portal
- Detection rules were checked against the evidence they record for a sample of businesses in every group, and revised before the final run
- Every published figure is recomputed from the data at build time, and a statement in the text that the data does not support stops the build
- Results are published only after automated checks for missing data, anonymity, accessibility of the report itself and the margin of error statement pass

### A8. Limitations

- A point-in-time snapshot: sites change, and a site may have improved or declined since it was read.
- Only public pages were read: the home page and pages it links to. Client portals were not logged into, and contact forms were not submitted.
- Answers are read from the page as a server delivers it. Content that only appears after scripts run in the browser (some schedulers and review widgets) is not seen, which the study counts as a gap a search engine or a slow phone would also meet.
- 19 candidates refused automated visitors in robots.txt and are not in the study. Most use one accounting-industry website template whose stock robots.txt admits only search engines, so practices on that template are under-represented; sites behind such protection may differ from those studied.
- The study reports what a website shows. It does not judge any practice's accounting or tax work, its fees, or its compliance with any state board, IRS Circular 230 or advertising rule.
- Automated accessibility tests find only part of what WCAG covers; keyboard and screen-reader use need a manual audit.
- The sample is a structured list of real, independent practices, not a random draw. Margins of error are given as a guide to precision, not as a guarantee that the results hold for every practice in the country.

## Appendix B: practices in this study

Who was scanned, and nothing more: results are shown only in aggregate or anonymously.

### Small CPA firms (30)

- [Adam M. Beaudry, CPA, LLC](https://www.abeaudrycpa.com/), Worcester, MA
- [Ashman & Trotter, P.C.](https://www.markashmancpa.com/), Grand Junction, CO
- [Ben Badgley CPA PC](https://benbadgleycpa.com/), Asheville, NC
- [Brian G. Toennies & Associates](https://toenniescpa.com/), St. Louis, MO
- [Bryan King, CPA](https://bryankingcpa.com/), Lubbock, TX
- [Carew & Wells, PLLC](https://www.carewwells.com/), Concord, NH
- [EDG CPA](https://edgcpa.com/), Sioux Falls, SD
- [Foster Financial CPA](https://fosterfinancialcpa.com/), Phoenix, AZ
- [Fred Richards CPA](https://fredrichardscpa.com/), Madison, MS
- [Goodhart & Associates](https://www.goodhartcpa.com/), Mandan, ND
- [Greg Johnson, CPA, PC](https://www.gregjohnsoncpa.com/), St. George, UT
- [Hahn CPAs](https://www.hahncpa.com/), Boise, ID
- [Hood, CPA & Associates](https://www.hoodaccounting.com/), Chattanooga, TN
- [Hutchings & Associates CPAs](https://www.ak-cpas.com/), Anchorage, AK
- [J Kramer & Associates, PLLC](https://jkramercpas.com/), Wenatchee, WA
- [Jeffery D. Small CPA](https://www.jeffsmallcpa.com/), South Burlington, VT
- [Katherine M. Johnson CPA](https://kmjohnsoncpa.com/), Georgetown, KY
- [Kathol P.C. CPAs & Advisors](https://www.katholpccpa.com/), La Vista, NE
- [Kyle J. Towles CPA, LLC](https://towlescpas.com/), Columbia, SC
- [Lasko Accounting & Tax Services](https://www.laskocpa.com/), Ann Arbor, MI
- [Moscato CPA](https://moscatocpa.com/), Buffalo, NY
- [Myers CPA Group](https://www.myerscpagroup.com/), Fort Wayne, IN
- [Office of Cornelia C. Viek, CPA](https://www.viekcpa.com/), Brunswick, ME
- [Pasquesi Partners](https://pasquesipartners.com/), Chicago, IL
- [Peralto & Co. CPAs Inc.](https://peraltocpa.com/), Hilo, HI
- [Rocca CPA](https://www.roccacpa.com/), Minneapolis, MN
- [Rosenberg Accountancy LLC](https://rosenbergaccountancy.com/), Pittsburgh, PA
- [SBS CPA Group](https://www.sbscpagroup.com/), Fort Wayne, IN
- [Singleton CPA, LLC](https://singletoncpallc.com/), Huntsville, AL
- [Vishali Kachiraju CPA LLC](https://www.vishalicpa.com/index.html), Glen Allen, VA

### Bookkeeping firms (43)

- [504 Accounting & Bookkeeping, LLC](https://www.504bookkeeper.com/), New Orleans, LA
- [Accountable to You](https://accountabletoyouinc.com/), Sioux Falls, SD
- [Accounting By Rachel](https://accountingbyrachel.com/), Fargo, ND
- [AccountSolve](https://account-solve.com/), Doylestown, PA
- [Adams Bookkeeping Services](https://www.adamsbookkeeping.net/), Lorain, OH
- [Apple Bookkeeping & Tax Services](https://www.applebookkeepers.com/), Greenland, NH
- [Avenue Bookkeeping](https://www.avenue-bookkeeping.com/), Spokane, WA
- [Balance Quest Bookkeeping](https://balancequestbookkeeping.com/), Independence, MO
- [Balanced Bookkeeping & Accounting, LLC](https://www.balancedbookkeepingaccounting.com/), Broken Arrow, OK
- [Bandicoot Accounting](https://bandicoot.us/), Edina, MN
- [Better Bookkeeping & Business Solutions](https://betterbookkeepingtucson.com/), Tucson, AZ
- [Blacklight Bookkeeping](https://blacklightbookkeeping.com/), Hartford, CT
- [Blake's Bookkeeping & Business Branding](https://blakesbookkeeping.com/), Knoxville, TN
- [Bookkeeping and Accounting Experts, LLC](https://www.baexpertsllc.com/), Coral Springs, FL
- [Bookkeeping and Back Office Solutions (BBOS)](https://www.bookkeepingbos.com/), Florham Park, NJ
- [Bookkeeping Resources, LLC](https://bookkeepingresources.com/), Warwick, RI
- [Calculated Financial Services](https://cfsrockford.com/), Rockford, IL
- [Casper Accounting Solutions](https://casperacct.com/), Casper, WY
- [CB Accounting](https://www.cbaccountingllc.com/), Ada, MI
- [Cents-able Bookkeeping, LLC](https://www.centsablebookkeeping.com/), Providence, RI
- [ClearLedger Bookkeeping](https://clearledgerfl.com/), Clearwater, FL
- [Davis Professional Bookkeeping Services LLC](https://davisprofessionalservices.com/), Memphis, TN
- [DH Bookkeeping](https://dhbookkeepingllc.com/), Spokane, WA
- [Duckett Bookkeeping](https://duckettbookkeeping.com/), Santa Rosa, CA
- [FastLane Bookkeeping](https://www.fastlanebookkeeping.com/), Green Lane, PA
- [Frye Advisors](https://fryeadvisors.com/), Lexington, KY
- [HI Accounting Solutions, Inc.](https://hawaiiaccountingsolutions.com/), Honolulu, HI
- [In The Black Accounting](https://intheblackaz.com/), Tucson, AZ
- [Julie Moreno Bookkeeping & Payroll](https://www.morenobookkeeping.com/), Raleigh, NC
- [KJ Bookkeeping Services](https://kjbookkeepingservices.com/), Meridian, ID
- [LedgerZ Bookkeeping](https://www.ledgerzbookkeeping.com/), Las Vegas, NV
- [Ness Tax & Bookkeeping Service](https://www.nesstax.com/), Sioux Falls, SD
- [Norman Professional Services](https://normanprof.com/), Oak Park, IL
- [Oak Grove Bookkeeping & Tax](https://www.oakgrovebktax.com/), Lexington, SC
- [On Belay Accounting, LLC](https://onbelayaccounting.com/), West Kennebunk, ME
- [SCN Bookkeeping & Accounting](https://www.scnbookkeeping.com/), Braintree, MA
- [Simply Bookkeeping, Inc.](https://www.simplybookkeepingboise.com/), Boise, ID
- [Sweeney Bookkeeping](https://www.sweeneybookkeeping.com/), Wichita, KS
- [The Back Office Expert](https://www.thebackofficeexpert.com/), South Portland, ME
- [Uptown Bookkeeping & Advisory](https://www.uptownbks.com/), Fort Collins, CO
- [Vilms Consulting LLC](https://www.vilmsconsulting.com/), Boston, MA
- [Wilson Small Business Accounting](https://wsballc.com/), Delafield, WI
- [WM Accounting & Bookkeeping LLC](https://wmaccountingllc.com/), Manassas, VA

### Tax preparers and enrolled agents (41)

- [Affinity Accounting & Tax](https://www.affinityaccountingtax.com/), Albuquerque, NM
- [Ainsworth Accounting & Tax Services](https://ainsworthaccounting.com/), Lenexa, KS
- [Alicia's Tax Co.](https://aliciastaxco.com/), Lubbock, TX
- [Ameritax Bookkeeping & Payroll](https://ameritaxbp.com/), Indianapolis, IN
- [Azalea City Tax & Accounting](https://azaleacitytax.com/), Mobile, AL
- [Bacon & Gendreau Tax Preparation](https://www.bgtaxct.com/), West Hartford, CT
- [Carney Accounting and Tax Service](https://www.carneytaxservice.com/), Columbia, SC
- [Daphne's Tax Service](https://www.daphnestaxservice.com/), Raeford, NC
- [Delkot Tax & Accounting Services](https://delkottax.com/), Hyattsville, MD
- [Donaghy Tax Consulting](https://donaghytaxconsulting.com/), Fresno, CA
- [Easy Tax Service](https://easytaxserviceprescottvalley.com/), Prescott Valley, AZ
- [Flower City Tax & Accounting Services](https://flowercitytax.com/), Rochester, NY
- [Hicks Tax & Accounting](https://www.hickstax.com/), Ames, IA
- [Integrity Taxes & Accounting Services](https://www.integrity-taxes.com/), Knoxville, TN
- [J Turner Tax Consultants, LLC](https://www.jturnertax.com/), Baton Rouge, LA
- [JK Tax & Accounting Service, Inc.](https://www.jktaxut.com/), Ogden, UT
- [Jumping Jack Taxes](https://www.jumpingjacktaxes.com/), Philadelphia, PA
- [Kenise's Tax & Business Services, LLC](https://kenisestax.com/), Augusta, GA
- [Lassiter Tax Service](https://lassitertaxservice.com/), Cleveland, OH
- [Leon Tax Services](https://leontaxes.com/), Waterbury, CT
- [Long Forms Short Forms](https://www.longformsshortforms.com/), Syracuse, NY
- [Lutz Tax Services](https://www.tax-prep-services.com/), Albany, NY
- [Maine Beancounters](https://www.mainebeancounters.com/), Brunswick, ME
- [Manuel A. Rodriguez Income Tax Service](https://www.unioncitytaxes.com/), Union City, NJ
- [Moore Tax Solutions](https://www.mooretaxsolutions.com/), Lake Oswego, OR
- [Murphy Financial Services](https://www.murphyea.com/), Milwaukee, WI
- [Northside Tax Service, Inc.](https://www.tallytaxman.com/), Tallahassee, FL
- [Olympia Tax Service](https://olytax.com/), Olympia, WA
- [Pinnacle Tax & Accounting](https://pinnacletaxwausau.com/), Wausau, WI
- [PTS Financial & Tax Services Inc.](https://ptsfinancial.com/), Tacoma, WA
- [Sanchez Ortiz Tax Services](https://sanchezortiztaxservices.com/), Killeen, TX
- [Schrotenboer Tax & Accounting](https://schrotenboertax.com/), Grand Rapids, MI
- [Seacoast Tax Services](https://www.seacoasttaxservices.com/), Portsmouth, NH
- [Shockley Tax Services & Bookkeeping](https://www.shockleybooks.com/), Broken Arrow, OK
- [Sun City Tax Service](https://www.suncitytaxnm.com/), Las Cruces, NM
- [Tax Help O'Malley](https://www.taxhelpomaha.com/), Omaha, NE
- [Tilghman Accounting + Tax Solutions](https://tilghtax.com/), Allentown, PA
- [Tosa Accounting & Tax Service](https://tosaaccountingandtax.com/), Wauwatosa, WI
- [Triangle Tax Service](https://triangletaxreno.com/), Reno, NV
- [Western Nevada Tax Service](https://westernnvtaxservice.net/), Reno, NV
- [Zenger & Zenger Tax Service](https://ztaxservice.com/), Louisville, KY

### Advisory and fractional CFO (44)

- [Accumulus](https://accumulus.cpa/), Honolulu, HI
- [AMCFO](https://www.amcfo.com/), Rocklin, CA
- [Ascend (Ascend Fractional Finance)](https://www.ascendvt.com/), Burlington, VT
- [ATG Advisors](https://atgadvisors.com/), Charlotte, NC
- [Attracct Accounting Advisors](https://attracctadvisors.com/), Baton Rouge, LA
- [Barba CFO](https://www.barbacfo.com/), Warwick, RI
- [Bookkeeping & CFO Solutions 5280](https://bookkeepingsolutions5280.com/), Denver, CO
- [Capone & Associates](https://caponeandassociates.biz/), Wilmington, NC
- [Cathy Kemnitz Consulting](https://ckemnitzconsulting.com/), Portland, OR
- [CFO 1 Source](https://cfo1source.com/), New Orleans, LA
- [CFO Associates](https://www.cfoassociates.com/), Stamford, CT
- [CFO Concepts](https://cfoconcepts.com/), Pittsburgh, PA
- [CFO Logistics](https://www.cfologistics.com/), Tulsa, OK
- [CFO Network](https://www.cfonet.biz/), North Little Rock, AR
- [CFO Simplified](https://www.cfosimplified.com/), Chicago, IL
- [CFO Solutions of Wisconsin](https://cfosolutionsofwisconsin.com/), Germantown, WI
- [ClearPath CFO Advisory](https://clearpath-cfo.com/), Brooklyn, NY
- [Crown CFO](https://crowncfo.com/), Kansas City, MO
- [Cultivate Accounting](https://cultivatelex.com/), Lexington, KY
- [Cushnoc Group](https://www.cushnocgroup.com/), Cincinnati, OH
- [CustomOne CFO & Controllers](https://customonecfo.com/), West Des Moines, IA
- [DreamPath Financial](https://dreampathfinancial.com/), Ann Arbor, MI
- [Execuly](https://www.execuly.com/), Lancaster, PA
- [GrowthLab Financial Services](https://www.growthlabfinancial.com/), Providence, RI
- [JTO Advisors](https://jtoadvisors.com/), Haddonfield, NJ
- [Keep Financials](https://keepfinancials.com/), Columbus, OH
- [Magnolia Associates](https://magnoliaassociates.io/), Indianapolis, IN
- [Mandrell's CFO Services, LLC](https://mandrellscfo.com/), Gainesville, FL
- [Mavenly Consultants](https://www.mavenlyconsultants.com/), Cumberland, RI
- [Mighty Financial](https://mightyfinancial.com/), North Attleborough, MA
- [Mike Manoloff Business Advisor LLC](https://www.cfo-advisor.pro/), Sugar Land, TX
- [MOD Ventures LLC](https://modventuresllc.com/), Tucson, AZ
- [OiProfit](https://oiprofit.com/), Reno, NV
- [Opus Consulting](https://opuscg.com/), Portland, ME
- [Phoenix CFO Solutions](https://www.phoenixcfosolutions.com/), Scottsdale, AZ
- [Rock CFO](https://rockcfo.com/), Kansas City, MO
- [Seattle CFO](https://www.seattlecfo.com/), Seattle, WA
- [Sentinel Finance Group](https://www.sentinelfinancegroup.com/), Kansas City, MO
- [Sugarcreek Consulting](https://www.sugarcreekconsulting.com/), Centerville, OH
- [Tee Up Advisors](https://www.teeupnextgen.com/), Sacramento, CA
- [Time Value Accounting & Advisory Services, LLC](https://timevalueaccounting.com/), Durham, NC
- [Two Roads Bookkeeping & CFO Services](https://www.tworoadsco.com/), Knoxville, TN
- [Valley CFO](https://www.valleycfo.cpa/), Portland, OR
- [Wallace Accounting & Advisory](https://wallaceaa.com/), Denton, TX

## Disclaimer

This report is based on automated scans of publicly available home pages, and pages they link to, run on 2026-10-15. Its findings are a point-in-time technical snapshot of each website. They are not a judgement of any practice's accounting, tax work or fees, and automated checks may contain errors. This report is not tax or accounting advice, and it is not a judgement of whether any practice complies with the rules of any state board of accountancy, the IRS or any professional body. Clikiti is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, any practice listed here; trademarks belong to their owners. The report is provided "as is" under CC BY 4.0, without warranty of any kind. Photographs are illustrations created with generative AI; every person shown is fictional. The usability review is carried out by an automated vision model under the rules in A5.

**[Remove my practice from this study](mailto:hello@clikiti.com?subject=Remove%20my%20practice%20from%20the%20State%20of%20Independent%20Accountant%20Websites%20study&body=Please%20remove%20my%20practice%20from%20this%20study.%0A%0APractice%20name%3A%0APractice%20website%3A%0AMy%20role%20at%20the%20practice%3A%0AHow%20to%20contact%20me%3A)**

We review every request and reply when it's done; removed practices are excluded from future editions.
